A common theme in the games industry is comparing the state of games right now with the cinema industry at the same age. "They already had their breakthroughs like Citizen Kane!" is so old hat now that it's painful - the implication being that games have nothing to show for themselves. There are impressive games already, but the typical responses to this criticism from games industry apologists are 1) In the modern industry, producing games is so expensive that games have become conservative much faster than film and 2) that games and cinema are very different mediums, and the comparison is just not valid. While there may be merit in the first claim, I'm a firm believer in the second. Games are different from cinema - very different.